Home » Blog » What If Working Harder Isn’t Actually the Answer?

What If Working Harder Isn’t Actually the Answer?

October 8, 2026
9:19 am
Human Performance Optimisation, Leadership, Personal development, Professional development, Resilience, Stress

What If Working Harder Isn’t Actually the Answer?

We’ve misunderstood the question…

“Busy is a form of laziness—lazy thinking and indiscriminate action.”

Tim Ferriss

We’re used to thinking of high performance as a fairly simple equation:

Set ambitious goals.
Work hard.
Maintain high standards.
Get results.

And, for a lot of us, it works.

So when something matters, we work harder.

A deadline is approaching? Put the hours in.

A big project needs delivering? Find another gear.

Want the promotion? Prove yourself.

Want to achieve something ambitious? Work harder.

It makes sense.

In fact, if you’re someone who has achieved a lot, you probably have plenty of evidence that working harder works.

But what if working harder isn’t actually the answer every time?

Not because hard work doesn’t matter.

Not because ambition is the problem.

But because effort is only one part of performance.

Working harder works — so why would we question it?

There’s a reason “work harder” is such a powerful strategy – “Effort” is something you can generally control.

You might not control the deadline. You might not control what lands in your inbox. You might not control other people’s decisions, changing priorities or how complicated the situation becomes.

But you can decide to put more in.

More hours.

More focus.

More determination.

More persistence.

And when you’re capable, ambitious and determined, that can take you a long way.

I know it did for me.

For years, I genuinely acted on the belief that if you worked hard enough, you could achieve your dreams.

And there was plenty of evidence to support that belief.

Work hard → get results.

Put the extra hours in → get noticed.

Push through → deliver.

Take on more → progress.

So why would you question something that appears to be working?

The problem isn’t that working hard doesn’t work.

The problem is assuming that more effort is always the best way to improve performance.

Because those are two very different things.

Effort isn’t the same as performance

We often measure performance through the output we can see.

What did you achieve?

How much did you get done?

Did you hit the target?

Did you meet the deadline?

How many hours did you work?

But there’s a difference between the effort you put in and the performance that effort produces.

The hours of work completed is something you can count. The cognitive conditions in which that work happened are much harder to see.

And that’s important because performance isn’t happening in a vacuum. A review of 64 studies examining work-related factors and cognitive function found evidence that factors including shift work, occupational stress and prolonged working hours can adversely affect cognitive functioning.

You can work incredibly hard and still spend your effort in the wrong place.

You can work longer because a process is inefficient.

You can keep pushing because you’re compensating for low energy.

You can spend hours on something because you’re trying to make a difficult decision with a brain that desperately needs a break.

You can put enormous effort into maintaining a standard when changing the way you approach the task could make that standard easier to achieve.

And sometimes, of course, the answer really is to put more effort in. That’s the point.

We’re not trying to replace work harder with another rule entirely.

We’re asking whether effort should always be our first and only performance lever.

Because the amount of effort you use tells you how hard you worked.

It doesn’t necessarily tell you how well you performed!

What happens when working harder becomes the default?

This is where things get interesting.

If working harder repeatedly has helped you succeed, it’s natural to reach for it whenever you face a challenge.

Something isn’t working? Work harder.

Something is taking too long? Work harder.

Feeling behind? Work harder.

More responsibility? Work harder.

And because you’re capable of making it work, you often do.

You get the result.

You meet the deadline.

You solve the problem.

You get through the difficult period.

Which just reinforces the belief that the strategy was right.

But what if your determination and perseverance are doing most of the heavy lifting that the system should actually be doing?

What if you’re using effort to compensate for something else?

An environment that makes concentration harder.

A lack of recovery.

Poorly timed demanding work.

An inefficient process.

Constant interruptions.

Decision fatigue.

Low energy.

Unclear priorities.

Or simply asking your brain to produce its best thinking when it doesn’t have the capacity to do so.

Your determination can carry you a long way. But that doesn’t mean it should have to carry everything!

And this is where we are rethinking what we mean by high performance.

Working “smarter” isn’t necessarily the answer either

At this point, you might be thinking: Fine. So don’t work harder. Work smarter.

And yes – working smarter can absolutely help, sometimes.

Improving a process, removing unnecessary work, using technology more effectively or finding a better way to organise your time can all improve performance.

But “work smarter, not harder” still frames the problem primarily as one of efficiency.

How can I get all of this done faster?

How can I fit more into the same amount of time?

How can I get more output in the same amount of time?

Useful questions.

But they’re not the only questions.

Because you can become incredibly efficient at doing something that isn’t actually enabling you to perform at your best.

You can have a perfectly organised calendar and still be exhausted and struggle to think clearly.

You can have an efficient process and still be doing the wrong work or making poor decisions.

You can be ticking things off your to-do list quickly and still spend your best thinking on the least important things.

You can optimise the way you’re working without ever asking whether the conditions you’re working in are allowing you to perform well.

That’s a bigger question.

So what if there are actually many more performance levers than just effort?

High performance isn’t created by just turning up the “effort” dial, like you would with a heating system.

Imagine there are actually multiple levers influencing what you’re capable of producing.

Your energy.

Your focus.

Your cognitive capacity.

Your physical capacity.

Your recovery.

Your environment.

Your decision-making.

The way you structure your work.

The demands you’re managing.

The timing of different types of work.

All of these can influence your ability to perform.

And they’re not independent.

Change one, and you may affect another.

That’s why sustainable high performance isn’t simply about finding a way to work harder for longer.

It’s about understanding what enables you to perform at your best.

What gives you the capacity to think clearly?

When do you make your best decisions?

What helps you focus?

What affects your energy?

What allows you to recover and come back ready to perform again?

What happens to your performance when the demands increase?

And perhaps the most useful question of all:

Which performance lever would make the biggest difference right now?

That’s a very different question from:

How can I work harder?

The hidden cost of relying on effort

There’s another reason this matters.

When you’re tired, the answer isn’t always simply that you have less energy to do the work.

Your ability to do the work well can be affected too.

High-quality performance requires more than simply being physically present.

It requires attention.

Judgement.

Problem-solving.

Creativity.

Decision-making.

The ability to see options rather than simply reacting to what’s immediately in front of you.

And when you’re operating with depleted capacity, those things can become harder.

Which creates a slightly uncomfortable paradox:

You can work harder in pursuit of a better result, while simultaneously reducing the capacity you need to produce that result well.

A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 studies found that even a single night of restricted sleep increased sleepiness and impaired sustained attention.

That’s why hours worked aren’t the same thing as performance.

And why “I’ll just push through” isn’t always the high-performance strategy it appears to be.

Yes, sometimes pushing through is exactly what is required – but if pushing through becomes your default response, it’s worth asking what else might be influencing your performance.

What if the next level isn’t more effort?

If you’re ambitious, it’s very easy to define the next level as more.

More responsibility.

More achievement.

More experience.

More projects.

More goals.

More output.

And there’s nothing inherently wrong with that – but there is another kind of progression.

Instead of asking:

What else can I achieve?

you could ask:

How can I become better at operating?

What enables you to produce your best work?

What conditions allow you to make better decisions?

Where does your energy come from?

What helps you focus?

What affects your capacity?

What allows you to recover and come back ready to perform again?

And where are you currently using determination and effort to compensate for something that could be optimised instead?

These aren’t questions about lowering your standards.

They’re questions about understanding what makes those standards achievable.

Sustainable high performance starts with a different question

This is where the idea of sustainable high performance becomes interesting.

It’s not about working less for the sake of working less.

It’s not about “replacing” ambition with reduction.

And it’s not simply about becoming more efficient.

It’s about understanding the conditions that enable you to consistently operate at a high standard.

Because if you’re serious about performance, surely it makes sense to understand what makes your performance possible.

Sometimes the answer might be more effort.

Sometimes it might be a smarter process.

Sometimes it might be recovery.

Sometimes it might be changing your environment.

Sometimes it might be improving your focus or decision-making.

And sometimes the thing that makes the biggest difference might be something you hadn’t even considered a performance factor before.

That’s the opportunity.

Not to do less.

Not to want less.

But to understand more.

What if working harder isn’t actually the answer?

Maybe working harder will sometimes be exactly what you need – but what if it isn’t always?

What if the goal isn’t to become better at pushing yourself through every challenge?

What if it’s to become better at understanding what enables you to perform at your best?

Because the next time something isn’t working, you could automatically reach for more effort.

Or you could pause for a moment and ask:

What would actually improve my performance here?

That question might lead you to work harder.

It might lead you to work smarter.

Or it might lead you somewhere completely different.

And that’s where another way starts.

Sustainable High Performance Looks Different

One of the biggest misconceptions I encounter is that sustainable performance somehow means lowering your standards.

Taking your foot off the accelerator.

Settling for less.

I don’t believe that’s true at all.

In fact, I think sustainable high performance requires far greater discipline than simply working harder.

It requires the discipline to recover before you feel guilty for resting.

The discipline to establish boundaries before they’re desperately needed.

The discipline to say no to good opportunities so that you still have the capacity to say yes to the right ones.

The discipline to recognise that your energy is one of your most valuable resources, not an unlimited supply to be spent without thought.

That’s a very different kind of resilience.

It’s quieter.

Less visible.

Less likely to earn applause.

But over years, rather than weeks, it’s the approach that allows people to keep growing without sacrificing themselves in the process.

Frequently Asked Questions

If I work less, will I actually achieve more?

Not necessarily…but the more useful question is whether additional hours are actually improving the outcome?

If you’re spending extra time because the work genuinely requires it, that’s one thing. If you’re spending extra time because you’re over-compensating for low energy, poor processes, unclear priorities, ineffective decision-making or an environment that makes good work harder, that’s something else.

The aim isn’t to work less for the sake of working less.

It’s to understand what enables you to perform at your best — and make better use of your capacity.

How can I possibly achieve more by working less?

You might not – and that’s an important distinction.

The promise isn’t that you can simply cut your working hours and magically produce more.

The opportunity is that changing the conditions in which you work can change what you’re capable of producing.

If you have more capacity for focused thinking, make better decisions, recover effectively and spend your effort on the things that matter most, you may produce better outcomes without simply adding more time.

Sometimes that will mean fewer hours.

Sometimes it will mean achieving more within the same hours.

The objective isn’t the number on the clock.

It’s the quality and consistency of your performance.

Why isn’t working smarter enough?

Working smarter is useful, but it can still reduce performance to a question of efficiency:

How can I get this done faster?

That’s valuable when the problem is inefficiency.

But what if the inefficiency is a symptom, and the issue is actually your energy? Your ability to concentrate? Your decision-making? Your recovery? Your environment? The demands you’re managing? The way you’re approaching the problem in the first place?

You could become extremely efficient at something that isn’t actually helping you perform at your best.

Working smarter is one potential performance lever. Sustainable high performance looks at the wider system.

What if I don’t have any control over how much work comes in?

This is where the idea of sustainable high performance becomes particularly useful.

You may not control the volume of work, the demands of your role, organisational priorities or what lands in your inbox. But that doesn’t necessarily mean you have no influence over how you operate within those demands.

You can start asking different questions:

What requires my best thinking?

When am I most capable of doing that work?

What is affecting my ability to focus?

Where am I using effort to compensate for something else?

What conditions help me make better decisions?

What can I influence, even if I can’t control the demand itself?

Sustainable high performance isn’t about pretending you have complete control over your working environment.

It’s about understanding where your influence actually sits — and optimising what you can.

But working harder has always worked for me. Why would I change it?

You don’t need to abandon working hard – if working harder has helped you achieve what you’ve wanted, that’s valuable evidence that you can produce results under pressure and sustain significant effort when it’s required.

But success gives you an opportunity to ask a more interesting question:

Could there be a better way to produce the same — or better — results?

You may have become so good at making things work that you’ve never needed to investigate what was making them harder than they needed to be.

Past success tells you that your approach works. It doesn’t necessarily tell you that you’ve reached the limit of what that approach can achieve.

What are performance levers?

Performance levers are the factors that influence your ability to perform at your best.

They can include things such as energy, focus, recovery, environment, decision-making, physical capacity and cognitive capacity.

The interesting part isn’t simply knowing that these things matter.

It’s understanding which factors have the greatest influence on your performance, when they matter, how they interact, and what happens when you deliberately change them.

That’s where performance optimisation becomes much more interesting than simply trying to increase effort.

Does sustainable high performance mean working fewer hours?

No – Sustainable High Performance isn’t about hitting an arbitrary number of hours or creating a perfectly balanced working week.

It’s about creating the conditions that allow you to consistently perform at a high standard.

Sometimes that might mean fewer hours.

Sometimes it might mean changing how you use the hours you already have.

Sometimes it might mean putting in more effort for a particular period because that’s what the situation demands.

The point is that hours become a variable to understand, rather than the definition of performance itself.

What if I actually enjoy working hard?

That’s not necessarily a problem. Ambition, challenge and hard work can be incredibly rewarding.

Sustainable high performance isn’t about taking the intensity out of achievement or convincing ambitious people that they should want less. It’s about understanding what allows you to access that level of performance consistently.

The more you understand your own performance, the better positioned you are to recognise when more effort is exactly what you need — and when another performance lever could be more useful.

You don’t have to choose between ambition and sustainability.

The opportunity is to understand what allows you to have both.